Possible iPhone nano design and details revealed by Apple patent

Ok people, you know the drill. Standard disclaimer here: patents may give us some preliminary details about a future product but companies — especially Apple — will patent anything and everything so don’t be too surprised if much of this patent never materializes. The biggest takeaway is likely the simple fact that Apple is indeed working on an iPhone nano in some capacity, as we’ve expected for quite a while now. That said, a reported patent unearthed this morning may shed some light on Apple’s preliminary designs where the elusive iPhone nano is concerned. According to the details revealed in the patent, Apple may in fact be considering a device that puts a new spin on touch interfaces by moving the touch surface to the back of the device. The front of the handset would be comprised entirely of a display and the back would be a “force-sensitive touch based surface”. Sounds… Interesting. The concept of controls on the rear of a device is nothing new but it has yet to reach the market in any significant way because, well, it’s counter-intuitive. Unless this design manifests itself with a front-facing touchscreen as well (for typing, etc) the safe bet is on this iteration of the iPhone nano never leaving Apple’s lab. Hit the jump for more images.

Thanks, Jerome!

[Via MobileSyrup]

Read

Tags: , , , ,

24 Responses to “Possible iPhone nano design and details revealed by Apple patent”

  1. 1
    1adonis1 says:

    Is that a click wheel. Lolz

    Posted from BGR Mobile (iPhone).

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  2. 2
    SamB. says:

    this will FAIL big time

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  3. 3
    Nerdherder says:

    Here is the newest iPhone, perfect for idiots like Steve Glansburg and BJ-ones(Bjones).

    http://www.theonion.com/content/news/apple_claims_new_iphone_only

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  4. 4
    tj says:

    For what it’s worth, this is merely a patent application. Much different than a patent.

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  5. 5
    Bob says:

    This patent app was discovered by AppleInsider two years ago.

    http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/05/10/apple_filing_reveals_multi_sided_ipod_with_touch_screen_interface.html

    MacNN didn’t do their research.

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  6. 6
    Skulljibb says:

    LOL, Nerdherder strikes again.

    Nerdherder +1

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  7. 7
    JakeyBoy says:

    Hey Zach E, looks like Bob just busted you big time. Thats gotta hurt. I keep telling you to research your facts, yet you don’t. Maybe someday you will learn.

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  8. 8
    JohnBo says:

    Wow, this information is 2 years old…

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  9. 9
    tRICKster says:

    @nerdherder
    LMFAO!!

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  10. 10
    BJones says:

    Nerd, I f-ing hate the Iphone. I got a dumb phone(eternity) at the same price because i didnt like the Iphone.

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  11. 11
    Nerdherder says:

    Ok Bjones, I apologize for clumping you in with the iSheep.

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  12. 12
    midibite says:

    You are wrong. Look at figure 3B and then figure 3A. The touch well is positioned from the right to the center. Therefore, this could possibly equate to a touch screen device with a click wheel, same as a touch screen keyboard.

    That what the patent implies.

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  13. 13
    Andrew says:

    So is Apple trying to patent a touchscreen keyboard with 2 Vs and no letter D? Innovative.

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  14. 14
    2sikk says:

    This Is Intresting but not a good idea

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  15. 15
    Jonathan says:

    Hopefully this idea won’t push through. Why don’t they just keep making the Iphone better with slight design changes more quality hardware and multi-tasking. Nano iphone is stupid, dialing, surfing with the clickwheel?

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  16. 16
    ~Phel says:

    At least Apple will be making a Derrick Zoolander approved phone now!

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  17. 17
    Resi says:

    @BJones,

    I highly doubt that you didn’t want the iPhone. It was likely due to their monthly costs. Yet, I may be wrong.

    Posted from BGR Mobile (iPhone) at: Redlands United States

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  18. 18
    Justin says:

    @Andrew Glad someone else noticed that.

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  19. 19
    Hank Rearden says:

    Force-Sensitive……like Annie????!!!!

    Posted from BGR Mobile (iPhone) at: (null) United States

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  20. 20
    James says:

    With Apple selling the 3G for $99, how much will they sell an iphone nano for? Would it be free? How could they justify anything more than $49?

    Just a thought

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  21. 21
    Mr. Hi-Definition says:

    Not happening…

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  22. 22
    Jj says:

    Why do you post years old information? #BGRFAIL

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  23. 23
    Erphan says:

    @Jj

    Hey idiot, why do you even come to BGR if its a fail? Why don’t you get ur latest leaks and spies from other sites you dumb ass. You probably never even heard of that 2 year old patent until now and you’re making it seem like you’re more superior than BGR cuz you can read through comments? Just STFU AND LEAVE IF YOU DONT LIKE WHAT THEY PRODUCE!

    ~ My Two Cents

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

  24. 24

Leave a Reply