Comments on: Alleged T-Mobile Q2 – Q4 2009 3G rollout schedule revealed

By: T-Dub

T-Dub — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:25:24 +0000

I just signed up for T-Mobile unlimited data for my iPhone at $24.99 a month. and it includes 400 txt msgs.
Make sure you get the plan for the G1 if you want to do the same.

By: Joseph

Joseph — Fri, 08 May 2009 01:41:17 +0000

@Daryl you realize Texas is the 2nd most populous state in the union?

By: Daryl

Daryl — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:11:30 +0000

T-Mobile – you guys are full of it. You fill little BS cities in the south with 3G and say f@ck it to larger midwest cities. I cant wait to drop you guys and your lame strategies. Get your money from the backwards southeners!

By: Jason

Jason — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:44:08 +0000

Wow. Wichita Falls never even got EDGE. I guess they’re going from GPRS straight to 3G?

By: Michael

Michael — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:47:47 +0000

Wow, and no expansions in Michigan. All they have is an extremely small area that they currently have in metro Detroit. I can’t believe how far behind they are and Verizon and AT&T are already planning their 4G networks.

By: Dtest54

Dtest54 — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:15:33 +0000

wait Galvatron got married?

By: peterrabbit

peterrabbit — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:01:39 +0000

Finally 3G in my area. Way to go T-MO! Now-When do we get a BlackBerry with 3G??

By: Ticked

Ticked — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:50:31 +0000

When 3G went up in the Philadelphia area and spread into NJ, in the summer of ‘08, parts of Mercer County NJ lost Edge signal. We retained plain GSM and also GPRS, which is interesting. It’s about a 9 square mile area. Tmo doesn’t care. Tmo doesn’t believe me. They obviously moved an antenna somewhere. What really irks me most of all, is I get emails from them announcing how they’ve made things better, by adding a tower here or there (sometimes 50 miles away!). FIE ON YOU, TMO!

By: TRV$

TRV$ — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:37:27 +0000

Henderson, Nev, aka East Las Vega$

By: mingkee

mingkee — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:35:42 +0000

it’s been quiet since last November, it’s about fucking time!!!
btw, there’ll have a lot of phones
4 fucking samshit 3G
nokia 5330
SE CS5, CS8
HTC tungsten
HTC sapphire

By: Mankato

Mankato — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:14:29 +0000

Now T-Mobile needs an cheaper data plan than Verizon and AT&T to lure customers away.Go T-Mobile:)

By: Galvatron

Galvatron — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:01:07 +0000

Nice Mesa fianlly getl out of the stone age

By: user

user — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:48:28 +0000

man, i wish they worked with the nokia phones:(

By: Chuck

Chuck — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:34:30 +0000

Each to their own. Go T-Mo!

By: C Dog

C Dog — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:28:29 +0000

Too little, too late. Will check back with T-Mo in 2012, and maybe they’ll have their sh** together then. T-Mo is the caboose of mobile providers.

By: Eric

Eric — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:28:05 +0000

This is pathetic. You might as well use Cricket or MetroPCS.

By: jared t

jared t — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:22:27 +0000

I’d also like to point out the “many more,” verbiage at the end of each announcement in the article. That may mean there are several other towns that will be covered but are simply not mentioned.

A local SoCal engineer told me that they are alos working on backfill projects locally. That means they are not only expanding coverage but they are beefing up existing 3G coverage too by adding more panels to new/existing cell sites and adding more backhaul capacity.

By: jared t

jared t — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:20:21 +0000

Nice to hear. Although I use Verizon at the moment, I like to give props to T-Mobile for gunning hard. The larger carriers need more competition.

The good thing about T-Mobile’s 3G network is that it’s less crowded. That should be a plus for users within their respected build outs.

Way to go T-Mo!

By: AgBand

AgBand — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:38:35 +0000

Wow, looks like my hometown has so good stuff coming in May.

By: dand

dand — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:37:56 +0000

the most anticpiated tmobile news of `09, F@cking delivered BG style.

That and Galvatrons wedding.

By: Pedro

Pedro — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:36:44 +0000

The fact that they spelled McAllen right, does give me some hope that this might be true, but there’s about 100,000 population wise there, why would the bring it to such a small area, and not a larger one?