Comments on: Case manufacturers at it again; iPhone nano in the works?

By: SellPhoneGuy

SellPhoneGuy — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:16:36 +0000

Perhaps the Nano is a CDMA version destined for Verizon since rumors indicate that it will be lacking 3g?

By: Peter S

Peter S — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:00:28 +0000

I´m not surprised to see a development like this. MNO´s have been compaining alot about
ARPU´s and would like to have a cheaper phone with lesser memory (1GB nano) to adresse lower market segments.Since Steve will have to give up his exclusive strategy anyway why not make a volkswagen instead of jet another beamer.

By: Paul

Paul — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:24:26 +0000

Just maybe the case company likes the web traffic from this. I doubt their will be an iPod nano. Why?

By: NickyHilton

NickyHilton — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:07:14 +0000

Iphone Nano? How cute! I would totally get one…

By: Jkuhn

Jkuhn — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:28:03 +0000

@bill i meant to add

By: Jkuhn

Jkuhn — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:27:26 +0000

you mean basically all the parts of the Iphone that suck?

By: civilian

civilian — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:15:39 +0000

they are going to give the iphone nano landscape sms and not put it on the regular iphone. then we will all want the nano.

By: jdlnmia

jdlnmia — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:00:37 +0000

From the looks of the post, he maybe using an iPhone Nano to write it out… Kidding!

By: Huuk

Huuk — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:20:34 +0000

This was painful to read. Please edit your writing before you post champ.

By: JJLO

JJLO — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:29:00 +0000

If they do, it would be good if they could find away around the exclusive deal they have with AT&T and open it up to other carriers.

By: Bill

Bill — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:26:33 +0000

I think an iPhone nano that doesn’t have a lot of features would sell really well. Just a phone, text, camera, and iPod. No data plan required, just a regular voice plan.

By: MJ

MJ — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:49:54 +0000

Well a Samsung Tocco sized iPhone would work. Heck the screen size on Sammys Armani was an ok size (even if the experience was lacking in terms of screen sensitivity and UI).

And at a lower price point it would be nothing but good for Apple – more users, more people using iTunes/App Store/iTunes Store. Accessory makers would be rubbing their hands as well at the thought of all those cases/scren protectors/useless docks they could sell too.

By: rj5620

rj5620 — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:40:37 +0000

I like my iPhone classic, but a bit smaller and much lighter with the same OS and perhaps some improvemnts like AD2P, what is not to like.

By: tande04

tande04 — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:30:17 +0000

I don’t know if I’d discount it based solely on Steve’s absence. There has been a push lately to get others in the lime light as well. What would be a better time then a major launch like this.

By: Likeabite

Likeabite — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:05:10 +0000

and here comes the onslaught of comments about how bad this would be, lol.
What purpose would a tiny iPhone serve anyway? The screen would be too tiny of about 90% of the apps in the app store and the price point would make everyone and their mother have an iPhone on deck.