Clicky

And This Week’s “Thinnest TV” Award Goes to…

Anorexia isn’t just a problem with models and teenage girls these days. Apparently the epidemic is spreading throughout the electronics world, and spreading fast. Apple, Toshiba, and others are vying to produce the world’s thinnest laptop, the title belt for the world’s thinnest mobile phone is always changing hands, and the television game is no different. Sharp has now claimed the prize, temporarily no doubt, with the announcement of its new line of AQUOS X LCD TVs. With a profile of 3.44cm and some fairly impressive specs, these sets are pretty hot. Beyond the dimensions, a contrast ratio of 15,000:1, 12-bit BDE and full 1080p should make for a terrific viewing experience. The largest model squeezes a 46-inch display into the ultra-thin frame and weighs in at a mere 38 pounds, yet it still thinks it’s fat when it looks in the mirror. Isn’t Sharp cheating a bit though? While this LCD TV is currently the thinnest of its kind, the tuner and I/O connections are actually housed in a separate external box. Whatever, it’s still one of the sleekest sets we’ve seen and gear freaks with a good amount of expendable income won’t have to salivate for very long; in Japan at least. Available in 37-inch ($3,290), 42-inch ($4,050) and 46-inch models ($4,510), the AQUOS X line is set to hit the streets of Japan in March. No word yet on availability or pricing in other regions. In related news, a jealous Snejana Onopka is reportedly purging twice as much since the AQUOS X’s announcement…

[Via SlipperyBrick]

Read

8 comment(s) for this post.

  1. On Jan 24, 2008 @ 2:11 pm, Hinano Said:

    Are there uh smaller models available? Like maybe 27″ or 32″? :[
    I live in New York, these TV sizes are like half of my apartment!!

    Permalink | Reply

  2. On Jan 24, 2008 @ 2:45 pm, Galvatron Said:

    lol you living new york in a denslypolulated area you apartments a hole in the wall but what do you expect for spot thats valued at $5000 a square foot

    Permalink | Reply

  3. On Jan 24, 2008 @ 3:12 pm, Hinano Said:

    I think its cheaper than that cause I live in Queens lol - but still those tvs are huge lol. My current TV is a 13 inch tube with a built in VCR. I think I’ll keep it around until they pull the plug on analog :P

    Permalink | Reply

  4. On Jan 24, 2008 @ 6:07 pm, S Said:

    Isn’t this the same concept behind the iMac? And how long has the iMac been around?????

    Permalink | Reply

  5. On Jan 25, 2008 @ 12:27 pm, Richard Said:

    I think I can see the lower right hand corner of the screen.

    It’s hard

    to focus.

    Permalink | Reply

  6. On Jan 25, 2008 @ 2:43 pm, amp Said:

    who cares about the LCD… just look at the girl near it! :)

    Permalink | Reply

  7. On Jan 28, 2008 @ 12:04 pm, Eric Said:

    What TV?

    Permalink | Reply

  8. On Mar 23, 2008 @ 1:23 pm, Cruiser Said:

    I’m all for it in my barnhouse stable converted into a lounge.. without Me Ed, TQ B4 one suggest it however, slim & thin as they come and larger than one can focus on… I just hope “she” doesn’t size down those beautiful “tidbits” she has on her….ummm.

    Permalink | Reply

Leave a comment on this post.