Comments on: One of Motorola’s most secret projects…

By: Mike

Mike — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 02:47:10 +0000

This phone is probably gonna be for at&t

By: TFSU

TFSU — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:24:40 +0000

The ROKR phones are so NOT what we’re talking about here.

By: nevarrie

nevarrie — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:44:36 +0000

I would love to see these specs on a phone that has a cover more like my Motorola Ming(A1200).

By: LK

LK — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:13:21 +0000

BG:

So are the specs correct but the image fake? Or are there two handsets?

By: Bjorn

Bjorn — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:21:08 +0000

You can have some informations on this website:

http://www.gps-mobiles.com/news.php?item.189

By: The Boy Genius

The Boy Genius — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 05:52:17 +0000

@LK

That is not the phone as far as I know. It doesn’t look like the E6.

By: VZWguy

VZWguy — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 04:22:48 +0000

Touch screen, and media…wow the 6700 had that two years ago, and if you think a full HTML browser is the extent of the SUPER stuff the Iphone came with you are just a stupid bait monkey following the idiodic banter of a hype machine in full gear.

oh, and that SWEET full html browser runs slower than a dead goat since the network it runs on is obsolete and outdated. good call on that one system…you sure are the man now dog.

Call me when it gets past
“TSFU the internet turns SIDEWAYS when you turn the phone sideways..AMAZING!!!!”

/yawn Iphone, pure butterface…hot body, ugly as hell everywhere else.

By: thejedipunk

thejedipunk — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 04:12:00 +0000

It has to be. The description BGR gave us sounded way too close to the Moto ROKR E6. Basically the same phone sans 3G.

By: LK

LK — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:39:14 +0000

The camera. Based of the specsheet of the X800, that’s the only improvement I can see.

Also, the Moto is smaller, if the size given on JustAMP.com is in fact correct.

I’m cautiously optimistic for this phone. The specs are almost TOO impressive (especially for Moto). Though, if BG says there’s a phone with these specs in the works, I am going to tend to trust him.

By: NuShrike

NuShrike — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:25:39 +0000

LK: good find! So how is this any better than an E-TEN X800 except not being WM?

By: LK

LK — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:16:16 +0000

http://justamp.blogspot.com/2007/08/motorola-rokr-e7.html

Is this it?

By: ...

... — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:32:18 +0000

@ adam,

That’s freaking hilarious.

By: Kevin®

Kevin® — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:24:44 +0000

Believe it when I touch it.

By: hill

hill — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:05:54 +0000

my moto loyalty which has been dwindling has been brought back to life.

By: gadgetchic

gadgetchic — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:25:41 +0000

here are the problems with the iphone: MMS, IM support, copy and paste, customization,3G. if all these things can be accomplished without possibly destroying your phone or voiding your warranty it would be the perfect phone. so if someone can produce a phone by Christmas that corrects all these flaws PERFECTLY that would be a true iphone killer.

By: Eddie Dollaz

Eddie Dollaz — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:56:40 +0000

Now if they could only manage to squeeze a qwerty keyboard in there somehow….

By: adam

adam — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:51:49 +0000

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tfsu&defid=2563588

the force is strong with this one…

By: Nino

Nino — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:54:28 +0000

i remember reading the Q9m was the answer to the iPhone. IMO its nothing close. thats probably why i only saw that once.

interested to see what this phone will look like.

Nino

By: James Allan Brady

James Allan Brady — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:48:13 +0000

yeah, it does sound like a lot of other phones being made these days, but with all the little things wrong with those devices, fixed.

By: System

System — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:39:25 +0000

Half the features?
Main features are touch screen, full web browser and media capabilities. Those VZW phones must be xtreme!

By: victor

victor — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:19:09 +0000

Wow, will this phone be released prior to some other companies great design probably not. Motorola has had some great ideas they just never followed through with them. But the phone could be everything we ever wanted. But wasn’t that the iPhone as well.

By: VZWguy

VZWguy — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:12:09 +0000

I can see it now, december 2010
“is this the answer to the Iphone”

verizon and sprint don’t need to answer the Iphone, the Iphone doesn’t have half the features the cheaper handsets at verizon do. it does however have a fancy screen and cure cancer. so maybe go ask the FDA if they have an answer for the Iphone.

By: bye_bye_jack

bye_bye_jack — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:03:03 +0000

the problem – rzr2 is waaaay overpriced. the halo effect of discounting the crap out of that phone for holiday will mean this will be waaaaay overpriced (if it even exists).

moto just keeps losing money and passing it on to the next model.

By: Mark M

Mark M — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:49:12 +0000

About time… Motorola needs to get back into the game, the RAZR2 was cool but… not cool enough

By: eJay

eJay — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:44:59 +0000

This is off topic but does anyone know what TFSU! means? I cant find it no where. Help is appreciated. Thanks

P.S This phone sounds off the hook…

By: mickeyp

mickeyp — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:36:25 +0000

Sounds good, if they release it before iphone version 2. After that I’m not sure what will be cutting edge anymore. Whats the next step?

The OS is the most interesting part, they need to move away from WM towards something new, that for me is the most interesting part of the iphone or the symbian phones.

By: EJ

EJ — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:30:01 +0000

Any idea on who the service providers will be? Could this be VZW’s “answer” to the iphone?