Clicky

Hello Zante. Hello Sidekick Slide

95 comment(s) for this post.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »

  1. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 2:43 pm, victor Said:

    Sweet Even without anything I am still the first to post. I hope people can post actual comments and not some gibberish.

    Permalink | Reply

  2. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 2:49 pm, eJay Said:

    Dang Victor you always beat me to the first post. This was a very interesting article though BG ;)

    Permalink | Reply

  3. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 3:04 pm, applefrk Said:

    wtf?

    whered it go… it was published by boy genius himself…

    Permalink | Reply

  4. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 3:05 pm, o Said:

    well???????????????

    Permalink | Reply

  5. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 3:07 pm, o Said:

    thats what Im talkinng about .. Is this real ??? specs ??? when ???

    Permalink | Reply

  6. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 3:28 pm, Randy Said:

    This looks like it’s strictly for kids. I’ll pass….

    Permalink | Reply

  7. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 3:29 pm, Geniuz Said:

    Well based on the picture it looks like the screen resolution is just as crappy as the sidekick 3 … hopefully its not.

    Permalink | Reply

  8. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 3:30 pm, Pwned Said:

    looks pretty awesome. except it’s purple.

    Permalink | Reply

  9. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 3:33 pm, slimchance Said:

    well hopefully this hits canada I want one these

    Permalink | Reply

  10. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 3:37 pm, mikeyp Said:

    colors and screen make it look like a kids toy.

    Permalink | Reply

  11. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 3:44 pm, Eddie Dollaz Said:

    Word, i’d be the laughing stock if i took this to work with me. Nothing looks sillier than a guy in a suit with a sidekick, lol….

    Permalink | Reply

  12. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 4:05 pm, Jake Said:

    wow this sidekick is certainly….different. im probably still goign to get it tho because of the (hopefully) better screen resolution. also im hoping thats its skiiny and will be actually able to fit in my pockets…. it kind of looks like a toy tho… please release specs on this!

    Permalink | Reply

  13. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 4:26 pm, Jesse G. Said:

    THE BEST EVER SIDEKICK I’VE EVERSEEN
    THE REST OF THEM IS WACK
    BUT IT LOOKS SIMILAR TO THA SONY UX

    Permalink | Reply

  14. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 4:40 pm, Yasmine Said:

    That thing is ugly. Fat. :o

    And yea it reminds me of the Sony UX too. hmmm….i’ll wait for a better sidekick to come out.

    Permalink | Reply

  15. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 4:42 pm, Brandon Said:

    Um…

    Ok.

    Permalink | Reply

  16. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 4:44 pm, Cesar Cardoso Said:

    specs, please, specs!

    Permalink | Reply

  17. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 4:52 pm, Zach Said:

    does no one else notice the motorola logo on it?

    Permalink | Reply

  18. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 5:10 pm, EvilYoda Said:

    So it looks like they eliminated the directional pad? The speaker’s built into the screen now, surrounding the logo…interesting decision. Looks a little thinner? Overall dimensions are otherwise the same, I imagine.

    Permalink | Reply

  19. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 5:31 pm, Jasper Curry Said:

    Whatttt! it has a Motorola logo!!! So this is the Sidekick Razr they have all been talking about! Woot!

    Permalink | Reply

  20. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 5:39 pm, Dan Said:

    The reason probably most aren’t really mentioning the logo is that it has been known for like over 3 months that motorola was working with Danger to create a new sidekick device. That or everyone is just looking at how toyish yet some what hot it is lol.

    Permalink | Reply

  21. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 5:40 pm, jasonsyn Said:

    Sharp should sue the crap out of Motorola for this. It looks way too much like every other Sidekick. Isn’t that against patent law?

    Permalink | Reply

  22. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 5:42 pm, JJ Said:

    Zack:

    That’s because it’s made by Motorola. ;-)

    Permalink | Reply

  23. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 6:04 pm, Dave Said:

    Ugly..
    This thing better have something special..

    Permalink | Reply

  24. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 6:04 pm, Andrew Said:

    That’s because even though Sharp manufactured the SK 1,2, and 3, Danger still controls all the patents over the device and always controls the development of the device. They don’t merely provide the OS.

    Permalink | Reply

  25. On Jul 10, 2007 @ 6:05 pm, Dan Said:

    Doesnt it depends on who owns the patent or to whom the device belong to? Just because Sharp created the devices prior doesnt mean Danger doesn’t holds the rights to it. Danger could’ve paid Sharp for the design and hardware design and from there have Danger claim it as there own. Unless I’m mistaken of course lol.

    Permalink | Reply

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »

Leave a comment on this post.